<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-US" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>sergiosantos.info - Can video support on Flickr be a good idea? Comments</title>
  <id>tag:sergiosantos.info,2009:/2007/8/can-video-support-on-flickr-be-a-good-idea/comments</id>
  <generator uri="http://mephistoblog.com" version="0.7.3">Mephisto Noh-Varr</generator>
  <link href="http://sergiosantos.info/2007/8/can-video-support-on-flickr-be-a-good-idea/comments.xml" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/>
  <link href="/2007/8/can-video-support-on-flickr-be-a-good-idea" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
  <updated>2007-08-11T23:26:31Z</updated>
  <entry xml:base="http://sergiosantos.info/">
    <author>
      <name>Alcides</name>
    </author>
    <id>tag:sergiosantos.info,2007-08-11:278:279</id>
    <published>2007-08-11T23:26:31Z</published>
    <updated>2007-08-11T23:26:31Z</updated>
    <link href="http://sergiosantos.info/2007/8/can-video-support-on-flickr-be-a-good-idea" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <title>Comment on 'Can video support on Flickr be a good idea?' by Alcides</title>
<content type="html">In my opinion, if Flickr manages to get a way of accepting *.3gp files both through web and email, I believe it will get some popularity (Youtube cannot do that in the present time. You must convert them into *.avi first, and nobody likes to waste their time).

If you analyze both Flickr and Youtube communities you'll see different types of contents. While in Youtube it's mostly junk videos (kids doing stupid stuff and funny videos, and so on), in Flickr there are most artistic photos, so if this goes ahead, flickr videos will be artistic while youtube will remain the same. No conflicts.</content>  </entry>
</feed>
